The Biology of Tribalism: Deconstructing "Them and Us" in Robert Sapolsky's Behave

In his monumental work, Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst, Robert Sapolsky embarks on an ambitious journey to unravel the intricate biological tapestry that underlies human behavior. A central and recurring thread in this tapestry is the pervasive human tendency to divide the world into "Us" and "Them." For Sapolsky, a neuroscientist and primatologist, this dynamic is not a simple moral failing but a complex biological predisposition, deeply rooted in our neurobiology, shaped by our hormones, and malleable to our culture and context. His exploration reveals that while the impulse to form in-groups and out-groups is ancient and automatic, the boundaries of who counts as "Us" are remarkably fluid, offering a hopeful path toward transcending our most divisive instincts.

Sapolsky begins by grounding "Them and Us" in the deep-seated mechanics of the brain. He explains that the amygdala, our brain's alarm system for threat and fear, activates more strongly when we see faces of an out-group member. This is not a conscious choice; it is a rapid, subconscious neural response. This heightened vigilance towards "Them" is evolution's crude way of saying, "Be careful, that one is different and might be dangerous." This automatic bias is then often overridden or modulated by the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the seat of executive functions like empathy, impulse control, and rational thought. The PFC can essentially tell the amygdala to calm down, assessing whether the out-group individual truly poses a threat. The critical insight here is that the strength of this PFC brake is variable. Under stress, fatigue, or cognitive load, the PFC's influence wanes, and the amygdala's primal "Them" response is more likely to dictate our behavior, leading to snap judgments, prejudice, and dehumanization.

Beyond the brain's structure, Sapolsky delves into the neurochemical soup that fuels tribalism. He highlights the role of the neuropeptide oxytocin. Sapolsky demonstrates that oxytocin's primary function is not to promote general warmth and trust, but to strengthen in-group bonds. It makes us more cooperative, empathetic, and attuned to members of our "Us" group. The dark side of this coin, however, is that it simultaneously makes us more suspicious, dismissive, and even hostile toward "Them" in the out-group. In this light, oxytocin is not merely a chemical associated with bonds or good will; it is a chemical of parochial love, reinforcing the very boundaries that separate human groups. This dual nature explains why feeling a powerful sense of community with one's own team, nation, or tribe can so easily coincide with heightened xenophobia.

Crucially, Sapolsky argues that the criteria for defining "Us" versus "Them" are astonishingly arbitrary and plastic. Our brains are primed to seize on the most minimal of differences to create categories. He cites psychological experiments, such as the famous Robbers Cave study, where boys arbitrarily divided into "Rattlers" and "Eagles" quickly developed intense intergroup hostility, despite having no prior differences. The dividing line can be race, religion, nationality, or something as trivial as supporting a different sports team, preferring a different painting style, or even being assigned a random group number. The brain's categorization machinery is so eager to sort the world that it will latch onto any available marker. This plasticity is both a warning and an opportunity. It warns of how easily demagogues can manufacture an out-group to unite a population, but it also reveals that the walls of tribalism are flimsy constructs, not immutable biological facts.

The most profound implication of Sapolsky's analysis is that seeing someone as "Us" fundamentally changes our neural and empathic response to their suffering. Brain imaging studies show that when we witness a member of our in-group in pain, our own pain-processing regions light up in empathy. When we see an out-group member in similar distress, this empathetic resonance is significantly muted. We literally feel their pain less. This neural deactivation of empathy is the biological bedrock of dehumanization, allowing for indifference and cruelty that would be unthinkable toward one of our own.

However, Sapolsky does not leave us as prisoners of our biology. The entire premise of Behave is that while our baser instincts have deep biological roots, so too do our capacities for compassion, morality, and overcoming those very instincts. He outlines the conditions under which "Them" can be transformed into "Us." The most powerful antidote to tribalism, he argues, is sustained, cooperative contact toward a shared, superordinate goal. Merely being in the same space is not enough; the contact must be cooperative, equal-status, and personally meaningful. In such conditions, the arbitrary boundaries begin to dissolve, and the brain starts to recategorize the former "Them" into a new, expanded "Us." This process actively engages the prefrontal cortex to overwrite the amygdala's initial bias.

In conclusion, Robert Sapolsky's exploration of "Them and Us" in Behave provides a devastatingly coherent biological explanation for one of humanity's most destructive tendencies. He demonstrates that tribalism is not a monolithic monster but a cascade of subconscious neural triggers, hormonal pushes, and cognitive shortcuts. Yet, his message is ultimately one of cautious optimism. By understanding that our brains are built for tribalism but also for plasticity and empathy, we can consciously create societies that foster the latter. The battle between our worst and best behaviors is fought in the space between the amygdala's alarm and the prefrontal cortex's wisdom. Knowing the biological terrain of that battle, as Sapolsky so masterfully maps it, is the first step toward winning it for the side of an ever-expanding "Us."

Deepseek