That’s a sharp question — it goes beyond "efficiency" or "scale" into something more existential: whether fossil fuels have unique properties that renewables cannot truly replicate. The answer depends on whether we’re asking about physical/energetic qualities, industrial functions, or geopolitical/economic roles.

1. Energy Qualities

• Energy Density & Storage in Molecules
  Fossil fuels are compact, stable, and portable forms of chemical energy. A gallon of gasoline stores far more usable energy in a small volume than most current batteries. Renewable energy itself is abundant, but it usually comes as electricity (intermittent and harder to store). Renewable-derived fuels (green hydrogen, synthetic hydrocarbons, biofuels) can replicate this to some degree — but they require extra conversion steps, making them less straightforward and often more costly.

• On-Demand Dispatchability
  Fossil fuels can be stockpiled and burned at any time, offering a kind of time-shifting of energy that solar/wind can’t inherently do without storage systems. This reliability is still their main advantage.

2. Industrial & Material Uses

• Feedstocks for Petrochemicals
  Fossil fuels aren’t just burned; they’re the raw material for plastics, fertilizers, solvents, lubricants, pharmaceuticals, and countless synthetic materials. Renewables can in theory supply carbon for these (via biomass, captured CO₂, or synthetic chemistry), but currently fossil fuels remain the cheapest and most concentrated feedstock.

• High-Temperature Industrial Processes
  Steel, cement, glass, and certain chemical processes still rely heavily on fossil fuels because they provide both heat and reducing agents. Green hydrogen and electric arc furnaces are emerging, but they’re not yet universal replacements.

3. Geopolitical & Economic Aspects

• Strategic Control & Wealth Concentration
  Fossil fuels concentrate energy into extractive sites (oil wells, coal seams, gas fields), creating geopolitical leverage and centralized economic power. Renewable energy is more diffuse and distributed — you can’t monopolize the sun or wind in the same way. This means fossil fuels provide a kind of political control lever that renewables structurally cannot.

• Infrastructural Lock-In
  We’ve built centuries of machines, transport systems, and industrial designs around fossil fuels. Renewables can replicate the power but not always the form factor without redesigning those systems.

---

✅ Summary:
Fossil fuels are unique in three respects:

1. Portable chemical energy with extreme density and storability.

2. Feedstock role in petrochemicals and materials.

3. Geopolitical concentration as a lever of power.

But — none of these are truly irreplaceable in principle. Alternatives exist (synthetic fuels, biomass, hydrogen, direct electrification), though at higher cost, complexity, or with new infrastructure demands. What fossil fuels really provide that renewables can’t is simplicity and concentration.

Why Fossil Fuels Are Still Central in Heavy Industry

1. Steelmaking

   • Traditional steel is produced in a blast furnace, where iron ore (iron oxide) is chemically reduced to metallic iron.

   • The reducing agent is usually coke (a coal derivative). Coke does two things:

     • Provides the heat (over 1,500°C).

     • Supplies carbon monoxide (CO), which strips oxygen from the iron ore.

   • Without that reduction, you can’t turn iron oxide into usable steel.

   • Alternatives emerging:

     • Electric arc furnaces (EAFs): recycle scrap steel using electricity (already common but dependent on scrap availability).

     • Direct reduced iron (DRI) with hydrogen: hydrogen can act as a reducing agent instead of carbon, producing water vapor instead of CO₂ — but this is still in early adoption and requires massive amounts of cheap green hydrogen.

---

2. Cement Production

   • Cement requires heating limestone (calcium carbonate, CaCO₃) to about 1,450°C to make “clinker,” the active ingredient in cement.

   • This process releases CO₂ from the limestone itself (process emissions) plus CO₂ from burning fossil fuels to reach that temperature.

   • Fossil fuels are ideal because they provide very concentrated, controllable heat.

   • Alternatives emerging:

     • Using electric kilns or plasma torches (experimental).

     • Substituting biomass or waste fuels.

     • Carbon capture to deal with unavoidable process CO₂.

---

3. Glass Production

   • Glass is made by melting silica sand and additives at around 1,500–1,700°C.

   • Historically, this has relied on natural gas or oil burners for continuous, reliable high heat.

   • Alternatives emerging:

     • Electric melting furnaces powered by renewables (being tested, but costly).

     • Hybrid furnaces mixing electricity and gas.

---

4. Chemical Industry

   • Fossil fuels don’t just provide heat — they’re the starting molecules for ammonia (fertilizer), methanol, plastics, and countless chemicals.

   • Example: Ammonia production via the Haber-Bosch process requires hydrogen, which is usually derived from natural gas.

   • Alternatives emerging:

     • Green hydrogen from electrolysis could replace natural gas as the hydrogen source.

     • Carbon for chemicals could come from biomass or captured CO₂.

---

⚖️ The Core Problem

• Fossil fuels offer a two-in-one package:

  • Thermal energy: reaching extreme, continuous temperatures cheaply.

  • Chemical reactivity: providing carbon or hydrogen atoms that take part in the reactions.

Renewables provide electricity well — but electricity alone can’t always replace the chemical role of fossil fuels, and producing renewable alternatives (like green hydrogen) is still more expensive and infrastructure-heavy.

---

👉 So when people say heavy industry is "hard to decarbonize," they mean:

• Not only do you need massive renewable electricity,

• You also need new chemistries and processes to replace the fossil carbon currently baked into steel, cement, glass, and chemicals.