Social Murder: Engels’ Indictment of Society
In The Condition of the Working Class in England (1845), Friedrich Engels introduces the concept of social murder, a phrase that condenses his moral, political, and rhetorical project into a single devastating charge. The passage begins by tracing familiar legal categories. An individual who causes another’s death through reckless injury is guilty of manslaughter; an individual who acts with foreknowledge is guilty of murder. Engels uses this legal scaffolding not as an endpoint, but as a trap: once we accept these categories, consistency demands we extend them beyond the courtroom and into the realm of political economy.
Engels argues that when society knowingly arranges conditions of life—filthy housing, starvation wages, poisoned water, punishing work hours—that lead predictably to early death, society itself commits murder. This is not metaphorical, but literal: the causal chain is as sure as the blow of a weapon, only slower, quieter, and hidden beneath the semblance of natural decline. He highlights the peculiar invisibility of such killing. There is no identifiable assailant, no singular hand holding the knife. The crime occurs by omission as much as by commission. The ruling class merely allows conditions to persist that it knows, from its own reports and commissions, are fatal.
The rhetorical force lies in Engels’ inversion. Instead of excusing industrial societies body count as the regrettable by-product of progress, he reframes it as deliberate violence. Instead of appearing innocent through distance, abstraction, and bureaucracy, society is unmasked as the most thorough and calculating of murderers. In supplying parliamentary reports as evidence, Engels completes the circle: bourgeois society will be judged and condemned on the basis of its own categories, its own facts, its own law.
Social murder, then, is not only a moral accusation but also a conceptual weapon. It collapses the false distinction between the violence of the street and the violence of institutions, insisting that both belong to the same ledger of death. What Engels makes clear is that society’s indifference is not neutral—it is an active, knowing decision to kill.
No comments:
Post a Comment