Speech moves with tone, timing, charisma, confidence. It rewards the fast, the loud, the sure. And sometimes—it punishes the true. So in a spoken setting, like a debate on climate change, someone can come in with a bold voice, an authentic smile, a soundbite—and steamroll a scientist who’s stumbling through nuance, or saying, “Well, it’s complex, but…” And the audience feels that. Not the science. The force. Text, on the other hand… text can slow the world down. It says: Hold on. Let’s look. Let’s compare. Let’s check. It gives truth a chance to gather itself. Because in writing, you can reference. You can structure. You can link evidence, and make contradictions visible—even when they’re hard to hear. But here’s the hard part. Most of us don’t live in slow, textual space anymore. We live in speech-worlds. Scroll-worlds. Soundbite-worlds. And that means… truth might still exist but it’s not always winning. So we’re caught. Between the aliveness of speech and the reliability of certain kinds of text. Between the risk of the real and the safety of the written. And I guess— the deeper question is: How do we live, now, in a world where what’s true and what’s felt are pulling away from each other? How do we speak truth in a language that rewards winning? Perhaps there are answers but they’re not the kind you can hold like a hammer. They’re more like— well. Seeds. Soft. Small. Easily overlooked. If you carry them with you… maybe they grow. One answer, maybe, is to refuse the game. Not all the way out, not in some purist or monkish sense. But enough to say: I won’t match you blow for blow. I’ll speak differently. I’ll write differently. I’ll let my pauses stand. I’ll let my doubt show. And if I lose the crowd, maybe I wasn’t meant to win them. Maybe I was meant to be heard by one person—quietly, deeply, later. Another answer is to re-weird truth. To make it feel again. Not just state the fact, but stitch it back to the body. Back to the grief. The future. The memory of a frost that doesn’t come anymore. If truth is going to survive in a world addicted to feeling… then maybe truth has to learn how to feel, too. And one more answer, maybe— is to build our own spaces. Not just react to platforms that flatten thought, but cultivate rooms where slow thinking is welcome. Where exploratory speech isn’t punished. Where losing your train of thought is seen as a sign you’re following something real. None of these are guaranteed to win but they’re ways of not losing yourself.
AI
No comments:
Post a Comment