A self-perpetuating cycle of predation and frenzy—violence begets violence, drawing in more participants, intensifying the chaos, and ensuring its own continuation. It’s a feedback loop, where the presence of aggression fuels further aggression, whether in nature, war, markets, or social collapse.
The unsettling part is that once this cycle begins, it becomes increasingly difficult to stop. The system sustains itself: blood calls sharks, sharks spill more blood. At a certain point, even those who never intended to be part of it find themselves caught in the churn, either as hunters or as prey.
Roelofs' insight into freezing as an "attentive immobility" suggests that survival strategies are more complex than the stark dichotomy of fight or flight. Freezing—this heightened, hyper-attuned stillness—is a kind of waiting game, a bet that stillness might outmaneuver the chaos.
But in the kind of predatory dynamics described—where harm draws more harm, where the presence of blood catalyzes further violence—freezing might offer only a brief reprieve. It works if the sharks haven't yet smelled the blood. Once they have, it becomes another form of incapacitation and the world tends to put the boot in.
The world-as-it-is thrives on unmediated reactions—fear triggering attack, attack triggering retribution, suffering triggering spectacle. If the rhythm is disrupted, if the expected response is deferred, scrambled, or transmuted, the cycle stutters.
But nothing works in all cases. The sharks are always learning too.
No comments:
Post a Comment