Simone Weil’s concept of malheur—often translated as affliction—is one of her most harrowing and profound contributions. It refers not just to suffering, but to a particular kind of suffering that strips a person of their interiority, their language, their relation to the world and to God. Malheur is not merely pain; it is a spiritual and existential violence that renders the soul mute.

🔥 What is Malheur?

Weil distinguishes between ordinary suffering and malheur. Malheur is:

• Irreducible: It is not redeemable through meaning-making or narrative closure.

• Depersonalizing: It flattens the self, rendering it passive, object-like.

• Radically isolating: Others may pity you, but affliction cannot be shared; it exiles the afflicted from the world of speech and mutual recognition.

• Violent in its silence: It cuts off language—not just speech, but the internal dialogue by which a person might understand or situate their suffering.

“Affliction is a laceration of the soul so complete that even the cry is strangled in the throat.”
— Simone Weil

---

🕳️ Affliction as Interpretive Starvation

In this light, malheur is interpretive starvation at its most metaphysical level.

• The afflicted person cannot interpret their own experience. Meaning collapses. Time collapses. Language collapses.

• The world no longer “speaks.” It no longer offers metaphors, signs, or resonances—it becomes dumb, hostile, or void.

• One is left unable to mediate between the inner and the outer, between suffering and sense.