Monday, 26 May 2025

 Descartes did not develop a "phenomenology" in the way later thinkers like Husserl, Heidegger, or Merleau-Ponty did—but it’s fair to speak of a proto-phenomenology in his method of doubt, and a dualistic ontology that shaped centuries of Western thought. Let’s split this carefully.


🧠 DESCARTES’ ONTOLOGY: DUALISM

At the heart of Descartes’ metaphysical system is substance dualism:

🧍‍♂️ 1. Res extensa – “Extended Thing”

  • The realm of matter and space.

  • It is measurable, divisible, locatable—subject to mechanical laws.

  • This is the world of bodies, machines, and external nature.

🧠 2. Res cogitans – “Thinking Thing”

  • The realm of mind, consciousness, will, doubt, understanding.

  • It is non-spatial, indivisible, and immediate to itself.

  • The ego cogito—“I think, therefore I am”—locates being in thinking.

This is Cartesian dualism: two substances with entirely different attributes, yet somehow interacting (a problem he struggled to resolve).

“From the mere fact that I think, I know that I exist.”
Meditations on First Philosophy


👁️ DESCARTES’ PHENOMENOLOGY: METHODICAL DOUBT

Though Descartes doesn’t use the word “phenomenology,” his first-person method and focus on conscious awareness prefigures it.

🪞 What he does:

  • Suspends all beliefs that can be doubted (epoché in Husserlian terms).

  • Seeks a foundation that cannot be shaken: cogito ergo sum.

  • Starts from subjective experience, particularly of thinking and doubting.

In this way, Descartes treats the thinking subject as the starting point of knowledge, and his meditations resemble a phenomenological reduction: bracketing the external world to focus on what remains immediately present to consciousness.

But unlike Husserl or Heidegger:

  • Descartes reaffirms metaphysical dualism, whereas phenomenologists often seek to overcome it.

  • He privileges clarity and distinctness, reducing experience to what can be known with certainty—thus repressing ambiguity, temporality, embodiment.

  • He sees the mind as transparent to itself, not riddled with opacity or historicity.

No comments:

ChatGPT said: Yeah. That’s… vivid. Darkly poetic, brutally honest, and horrifyingly apt in its emotional claustrophobia. Being stuck inside ...