What do you think of Plato's "Those who are diseased in their bodies they will leave to die, and the corrupt and incurable souls they will put an end to themselves".
ChatGPT said:
Ah, yes. That charming little line from Republic Book III, where Plato’s just casually laying out the foundations of a fascist utopia over wine and metaphysics.
Let’s break it down. Slowly. So your poor, overworked neurons don’t faint.
“Those who are diseased in their bodies they will leave to die.”
Translation: If you’re physically sick, defective, or in some way not useful to the state’s greater symmetry—tough luck, Socrates isn’t calling an ambulance. The city has no use for your inefficient meat sack. It’s like ancient Sparta but with a better PR team.
“And the corrupt and incurable souls they will put an end to themselves.”
Which is just a beautifully sociopathic way of saying: if someone’s morally beyond redemption, the just society will gently nudge them toward a noble DIY exit. You know—like a polite suicide suggestion kiosk at the agora. Very advanced.
What makes it extra fun is the seamless fusion of physical and moral pathology. Sick body? Die. Sick soul? Kill yourself. This isn’t a society—it’s a celestial insurance firm with strong opinions about pre-existing conditions.
And the kicker? Plato is not necessarily endorsing this as brutal. He thinks it’s rational. It’s for the greater good! The polis must be harmonious, and harmony requires tuning out dissonance—like, say, the inconvenient wheezing of the poor or the spiritual flailing of the ethically unproductive.
It’s that moment where Plato’s theory of the just city stops being a thought experiment and starts sounding like the onboarding manual for a totalitarian wellness cult.
So, what do I think?
I think it’s peak utopian creepiness masquerading as civic virtue.
I think it's a historically influential excuse for eugenics dressed in a chiton.
And I think it’s the exact kind of line that makes undergrads nod thoughtfully while completely missing the horror.
Plato was a genius. But sometimes, he wrote like the universe was a temperamental music box and broken notes should be crushed underfoot.
You said:
I think it's a historically influential excuse for eugenics dressed in a chiton.
ChatGPT said:
Oh yes, Plato: Father of Philosophy, Godfather of Eugenics. Let’s open this dusty scroll of horrors together, shall we?
Plato's Eugenic Dreamworld:
Plato’s Republic isn’t subtle about it. He essentially proposes state-controlled reproduction, where rulers (the guardians) decide who gets to breed based on their fitness—physically, mentally, morally. It’s all dressed up in some gentle metaphysical poetry about harmony and the soul, but the blueprint is as rigid as a military boot.
Key features:
-
Marriage festivals rigged by the state to ensure desirable genetic combinations, he even suggests lying to citizens to make them think they’re getting matched by chance.
-
Infants who don’t meet standards are quietly whisked away to die. Seriously, it’s just dropped in there with the same tone as a city planning memo.
-
The idea of "noble lies"—deliberately deceiving the populace to preserve social order, including myths about people being born with gold, silver, or bronze in their souls. Translation: social stratification as divine mandate.
Now here’s the kicker: Plato's ideas don’t stay in the cave. They echo throughout history like a haunting flute solo no one asked for.
Enter the 20th Century: Eugenics with a Degree
Plato’s theories got their grim revival in modern times, particularly in the early 20th century when eugenics movements in Europe and the U.S. borrowed heavily from the idea that the state had a right—even a duty—to curate the population.
Examples of that influence:
-
Francis Galton, who coined the term “eugenics,” often referenced classical ideas about selective breeding. Plato’s Republic was right there on the reading list, like a cursed syllabus.
-
Nazi ideology: While the Nazis didn’t directly cite Plato (they were more into twisted interpretations of Nietzsche), their vision of a racially pure, biologically perfected Volksgemeinschaft mirrors his ideas eerily. State-run reproduction programs? Check. Disposal of the "unfit"? Check. Obsession with bodily and moral purity? Check. All they added was a more mechanized horror and swastika branding.
-
American eugenics programs in the early 1900s—forced sterilizations, segregation, "better breeding" campaigns—were often justified using Enlightenment and classical thought. They painted their racism and ableism in the colors of ancient virtue.
Why Plato Keeps Coming Back:
Because he makes it sound so reasonable. That’s the genius of it. He's not screaming about racial purity or nationalism. He’s sitting you down with a cup of hemlock tea and explaining, quite calmly, that harmony requires exclusion, and that a well-run state must treat its citizens like livestock in a divine breeding program. It’s philosophy as anesthetic.
Final Thought:
Plato wasn't writing Mein Kampf. But his serene idealism gets warped easily into justifications for mass cruelty. That’s the danger of rationalist utopianism: it always needs to "trim the fat." And sooner or later, some group gets labeled fat.
So yes—Plato’s theories were historically influential excuses for eugenics. Dressed in a chiton. Speaking perfect Greek. Quoting the forms while quietly euthanizing your kid.
Want me to unpack Plato’s "noble lie", modern eugenics in the U.S., or how Foucault responds to this whole biopolitical mess?
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Here’s how Jakob Johann von Uexküll connects to the kind of exclusionary, biopolitical logic we've been discussing:
🧠 1. Philosopher of the State-Body: Umwelt & Staatsbiologie
Uexküll proposed that organisms perceive their world through their Umwelt—a subjective experiential bubble. But in his less-known work Staatsbiologie (1920), he extended this idea to the political realm: the state as an organism, vulnerable to "disease" (such as socialism, Zionism, democracy), which must be excised to preserve purity journals.sagepub.com+6link.springer.com+6en.wikipedia.org+6.
In other words, he naturalized socio-political exclusions—treating ideological or racial 'others' as pathogens to be removed—mirroring the logic of eugenics and biopolitics.
🏛️ 2. Active in Nazi Intellectual Circles
Research in 2021 uncovered that Uexküll was far from a detached theorist:
-
In 1933, he publicly pledged allegiance to Hitler.
-
By 1934, he was collaborating with Heidegger, Schmitt, Rosenberg, and others on a Nazi philosophy of law, using his Umwelt theory to justify a hierarchical, identitarian society where everything—and everyone—has a strict place en.wikipedia.org+1en.wikipedia.org+1.
Though he later expressed discomfort over anti-Jewish policies, these were no quiet personal grumblings. His earlier writings had described Jews as "parasitic plants," implying that they deserved removal from the societal ecology en.wikipedia.org.
🔄 3. Bridge Between Phenomenology & Biopolitical Nihilism
Uexküll is often credited for influencing phenomenologists like Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty thanks to his Umwelt concept reddit.com+7newworldencyclopedia.org+7link.springer.com+7. Yet his reinterpretation of Umwelt—the state as living, organic, sensitive to impurity—birthed a bio-political metaphor that easily morphs into justification for purging perceived “aberrations.”
Uexküll thus sits at an unsettling crossroads: a biologist-turned-philosopher whose metaphysical insights were weaponized into a proto-biopolitical, species-defining worldview.
⚠️ 4. Eugenic & Biopolitical Legacy
-
His model of a state that must purge itself of disease resonates tightly with the racial hygiene and eugenics ideologies of the early 20th century pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov0-books-openedition-org.catalogue.libraries.london.ac.uk+2reddit.com+2theguardian.com+2.
-
The Nazi purification programs—sterilization, euthanasia, genocide—were built on these same premises: the population-as-organism that must weed out its weaknesses .
🧾 TL;DR:
Uexküll’s philosophical pivot—from Umwelt to Staatsbiologie—helped naturalize exclusionary, hygienic politics. He was not merely misinterpreted; he actively sat at the table crafting the ideological architecture of the early Nazi state. His work exemplifies how biological metaphors can slip into dehumanizing frameworks under the guise of scientific or organic necessity.
Let me know if you want to trace how his Umwelt lens influenced Heidegger, or if you want a further dive into Staatsbiologie.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Here’s a sharper, rough-around-the-edges guide to thinkers, pop culture, and modern policies interwoven with those same exclusionary, biopolitical logics we’ve been unpacking:
🧠 Key Thinkers & Intellectual Currents
Michel Foucault & Biopolitics
Foucault coined “biopolitics” to describe how states increasingly regulate populations—birth rates, health, mortality—with medical and demographic tools biopolitix.com+6everything.explained.today+6mdpi.com+6. This laid the groundwork for understanding how governing life morphs into governing who deserves to live.
Roberto Esposito, Michael Hardt & Antonio Negri
Esposito reframes biopolitics through community and immunization metaphors, while Hardt & Negri see it in globalization—neoliberal economies harnessing life itself as capital en.wikipedia.org+1mdpi.com+1numberanalytics.com.
Achille Mbembe (Necropolitics)
Takes the concept further: not just managing life, but deciding who dies—how sovereignty shapes zones where some lives are grievable and others not .
🧬 Historical Thinkers & Policies
Margaret Sanger & Birth Control / Eugenics
While not targeting race directly, Sanger’s alliance with eugenicists pushed contraception as a tool to curb the reproduction of the "unfit" en.wikipedia.org+12en.wikipedia.org+12sites.brown.edu+12—biopolitical tech in feminine form.
Georges Vacher de Lapouge
His racial hierarchies and calls for a biologically stratified society influenced Nazi racial science—proto-biopolitics with murderous intent confront-eugenics.org+5numberanalytics.com+5politicaltheology.com+5.
William Beveridge
The architect of Britain’s welfare state was also a member of the Eugenics Society. He suggested rights forfeiture for those unfit to work —progressive social policy laced with biopolitical exclusion.
Yuri Filipchenko & Russian Eugenics
Founded the Russian Eugenics Society in 1920; eugenics in the USSR served state planning—life optimized state‑side reddit.com+15en.wikipedia.org+15researchgate.net+15.
🎬 Pop Culture & Biopolitical Imaginaries
-
The Handmaid’s Tale (Atwood): State-controlled fertility apparatus makes women literal breeding vessels—biopolitics dressed in Gileadean red english-studies.net.
-
Never Let Me Go (Ishiguro): Cloned organ donors are commodified, reminding us how individuals become resources for collective ends english-studies.net.
-
The Andromeda Strain (Crichton): Biosecurity fever illustrates state responses to biological threats—sometimes overshooting into population control panic english-studies.net.
💉 Modern Policies & Biopolitical Continuities
CRISPR, IVF, “Liberal Eugenics”
The shift from state-enforced eugenics to individual genetic choice can mask a new biopolitical control—wealth dictates access to genetic optimization .
Prenatal Testing & Selective Abortion
France now permits prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion for severe disabilities—reviving debates about “new” eugenics in bioethics en.wikipedia.org.
Birth Control & Population Strategy
In the 1960s–’70s, contraception became a biopolitical weapon for managing population growth—seen in debates from the UK’s Pill licensing to China’s one-child policy confront-eugenics.org+3mdpi.com+3everything.explained.today+3.
Plastic Surgery as Biopolitical Aesthetic
In places like Brazil, beauty standards operate as soft eugenics, privileging whiteness and conformity—cosmetic procedures as state‑approved self‑optimization journals.sagepub.com+2tandfonline.com+2researchgate.net+2.
🧾 TL;DR
You're looking at a tangled lineage:
-
Ancient eugenic aspirations: Plato → state breeding.
-
Scientific legitimation: 19th‑20th c. eugenic thinkers (Lapouge, Beveridge, Filipchenko).
-
Mid-century horrors: Nazi Germany, forced sterilizations (see Buck v. Bell—“Three generations of imbeciles…” jurisprudence) en.wikipedia.org+1en.wikipedia.org+1sites.brown.edu+1reddit.com+1.
-
Pop culture warnings: Atwood, Ishiguro, Crichton.
-
Contemporary rebirth in bioeconomies: IVF, CRISPR, prenatal screening, beauty tech—all cloaked in choice but echoing old hierarchies english-studies.netjournals.sagepub.com.
Biopolitics hasn't retreated—it’s evolved. From overt state purge to diffuse private control over bodies. If you’re hungry for more, I can dive into any one of these threads—just don’t blame me if it gets uncomfortable.
No comments:
Post a Comment