Mark Fisher’s metaphor of the predatory spaceship through the decolonial frameworks of Sylvia Wynter and Walter Mignolo—bringing together their critiques of knowledge extraction, colonial epistemologies, and capitalist enclosure of life and meaning.

---

🪐 Fisher’s Predatory Spacecraft & the Archive of Dead Futures

Mark Fisher’s image of the predatory spaceship (especially in Ghosts of My Life) describes late capitalist culture as a vehicle that:

• Scavenges the wreckage of past social imaginaries,

• Extracts cultural energy, styles, affects, and gestures from living communities or dead subcultures,

• Then stores them as trophies in a hollowed-out archive—treating the past like a conquered planet.

This is not just nostalgia or postmodern aesthetics—it’s a political economy of cultural death. The spaceship does not produce; it plunders. It cannot imagine the future; it replays what it has already captured.

---

🧬 Wynter: "Man" as Colonial Software

Sylvia Wynter can be read as diagnosing the operating system that the spaceship runs on. In her view, the figure of the “human” in Western thought—what she calls “Man”—is not universal, but colonial code. It is a historically produced, racialized, biocentric, Eurocentric category designed to:

• Define who counts as fully human and who does not,

• Justify extraction—not just of labor, land, and bodies, but also of cosmologies, epistemes, and ways of being.

The spaceship doesn't just carry artifacts; it runs on them. Its fuel is the disavowed lifeworlds of those it has declared subhuman or less-than-rational. When Wynter writes about epistemic colonialism, she’s naming this logic: the power to seize knowledge, strip its context, and recode it as Western academic “truth.”

In this framing, the predatory spaceship is powered by “Man2”—the secular, post-Enlightenment human who appears universal but is structurally white, Western, and capitalist.

---

🧭 Mignolo: The Colonial Matrix of Power & Epistemic Disobedience

Walter Mignolo’s notion of the “colonial matrix of power” maps perfectly onto Fisher’s spaceship: it’s a planetary-scale system for:

• Managing and organizing bodies, time, and knowledge;

• Extracting the epistemologies of the colonized and converting them into Western disciplines;

• Rendering other worlds of meaning invisible, illegible, or quaint.

Mignolo’s call for epistemic disobedience—for delinking from Western universals—is a form of breaking free from the tractor beam of the spaceship. He shows how universities, museums, and archives are not neutral: they are organs of memory control, ensuring that only certain knowledge counts.

He asks: what would knowledge look like if it were not filtered through the demands of colonial-capitalist reason?

---

🔍 Empirical & Structural Examples

These are not only theoretical insights. They are grounded in very real practices:

• Scientific racism and the classification of humans into hierarchies of intelligence and worth.

• Anthropological extraction of Indigenous belief systems, then reinterpreted in terms that erase their cosmological foundations.

• The use of African, Indigenous, and diasporic musical forms—from jazz to hip hop—gutted of political or spiritual content, commodified for profit.

• The enclosure of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) into environmental management schemes that exclude Indigenous sovereignty.

These are all examples of spaceship logic in action.

---

🏜 “Leaving a Desert Where the Real Should Be”

Your phrase resonates powerfully here. Fisher said that capitalist realism was the inability to imagine a future that wasn’t capitalist. But Wynter and Mignolo show that this realism is built on epistemicide—the systematic destruction of other possible realities, other “futures” that were alive in the past and still struggle in the present.

The desert is not natural—it is manufactured by conquest, by the constant abstraction and conversion of living worlds into data, labor, and spectacle. And yes, this leaves people defenseless—not only materially, but ontologically. Their ways of making meaning are first stolen, then fed back to them in forms that no longer nourish.