"What do you have to say to those that created this world, and what's keeping them from destroying us now... God's in their own right with limited power..."

This starts with a half-addressed theological-political riddle: a question to unnamed creators of the world—perhaps elites, perhaps literal gods, perhaps demiurges. The tone is Gnostic: the world as artifice, maintained by flawed or constrained powers. These "gods" are not omnipotent. They have limited power, perhaps enough to torment or deceive, but not enough to fully annihilate or redeem.

"Patience is founded on faith, if you know why not be patient..."

This is nearly Kierkegaardian: if you already know the outcome, why not wait for it? Yet it immediately turns: what if faith is hollow, or unavailable?

"And if you don't have faith and believe in no one, then sit down and smile and say... I know the truth and it sucks."

This is the center of gravity in the comment: an existential shrug in the face of revelation. The speaker presents despair not as paralysis but as a kind of lucidity. The truth is bleak, yes—but the smile is not ironic. It is the grim smile of someone who refuses self-deception.

"Do I really trust in myself? Or is this what gives me comfort so I can march on?"

A raw admission of existential fragility. Even self-trust is thrown into doubt. Is belief in oneself just another myth propping up survival?

"Something strengthens you, something inspires you to speak..."

Here, the speaker circles back: despite the despair, there is still a flicker of animating force. Maybe inspiration, maybe hope, maybe delusion—but it moves the speaker and the listener alike.

"This is not it. There is better, and better will come shortly..."

A sudden eschatological turn. From hopelessness to a cryptic promise: this is not all there is. It feels both prophesied and desperate, like someone trying to convince themselves as much as the other.

"A good dream is a good thing and has meaning. A bad dream is a bone in meat we acknowledge and discard."

A beautiful, metaphor-rich epistemology: good dreams nourish; bad ones are discarded with knowledge of their bitterness. Dreams are neither illusion nor prophecy—they are digestible signals. Some are worth keeping, others not.

"The freedom to think and speak is stimulating..."

This final gesture is generous. Amidst all the confusion and contradictions, the speaker affirms dialogue, speech, reflection as life-giving. It’s a strange comment, but it is also a recognition—that someone else is out here, questioning, resisting, sensing that this is not it.

---

Comment 2 – @smugram5937

"If you want to escape from the World, deny and scream death to the rotten world..."

This is apocalyptic, purifying rage. It echoes the voice of extreme renunciation—the kind that appears in both radical theology and political extremism. The world is not to be repaired but rejected. It evokes Dostoevskian despair or early Christian radicalism.

"Live as an ascetic monk in the orthodox faith. Seek for the truth."

This offers a specific exit route: Orthodox asceticism. It’s not abstract revolt—it’s concrete retreat. It aligns with old monastic traditions where the world is seen as corrupt and the soul can only survive by fleeing it, fasting, praying, seeking stillness. The implicit claim: the only real truth is not of this world.

---

Together, What Do They Tell Us?

These comments are not in dialogue, but they exist in the same metaphysical terrain:

• Both refuse to accept the world as it is.

• Both name truth as something painful, not flattering.

• One seeks interiority and symbolic meaning (dreams, speech, flickers of hope).

• The other seeks renunciation and austere fidelity to a tradition.

They're responses to the condition of spiritual and social exhaustion. One floats in liminality; the other chooses ascetic finality. One says: “something strengthens you.” The other says: “scream death to the world.” But both, in their way, are saying: this world cannot be taken at face value.

You could say one is Gnostic-mystic, the other apocalyptic-monastic. They're different masks of the same insight: we are surrounded by systems (material, spiritual, informational) that lie, obscure, or numb.