Here are some key empirical studies that examine the meritocracy myth and how structural inequalities are downplayed in favor of individual achievement narratives:

1. Michael Sandel (2020) – The Tyranny of Merit

   • Examines how belief in meritocracy creates social resentment and masks structural inequalities.

   • Empirical evidence: Surveys and economic mobility data showing that wealth, education, and success are largely inherited rather than earned through individual effort.

2. Stephen J. McNamee & Robert K. Miller Jr. (2013) – The Meritocracy Myth

   • Uses sociological data to argue that factors like social class, race, and cultural capital significantly shape economic outcomes.

   • Empirical evidence: Studies on intergenerational mobility showing that economic privilege is sticky across generations despite meritocratic rhetoric.

3. Leslie McCall (2013) – The Undeserving Rich

   • Analyzes survey data showing that while Americans believe in meritocracy, they also recognize systemic inequality, creating cognitive dissonance.

   • Empirical evidence: Public opinion surveys and economic inequality data from the U.S.

4. Annette Lareau (2003) – Unequal Childhoods

   • Ethnographic study showing how different social classes cultivate skills and resources that shape life outcomes, contradicting the idea of equal opportunity.

   • Empirical evidence: Longitudinal observations of working-class vs. middle-class parenting styles and their effects on children's future success.

5. Raj Chetty et al. (2014) – "Where is the Land of Opportunity?"

• Large-scale economic study using IRS tax records to track intergenerational mobility.

6. The Meritocracy Trap" – Daniel Markovits (2019)

   • Examines how elite education and professional pathways reproduce privilege rather than offering equal opportunity.

   • Uses economic and sociological data to show how wealth and advantage are concentrated in certain classes, reinforcing disparities rather than leveling the playing field.

7. "The Origins and Persistence of Black-White Differences in Wealth" – Darity & Mullen (2020)

   • Uses longitudinal data to demonstrate that racial wealth gaps in the U.S. are primarily the result of historical and structural inequalities (e.g., redlining, discriminatory policies) rather than differences in effort or merit.

8. "Inequality by Design" – Fischer et al. (1996)

   • Uses cross-national comparisons to argue that economic inequality in the U.S. is primarily a policy choice, not a natural consequence of differences in individual ability.

9. "Class Ceiling: Why it Pays to Be Privileged" – Friedman & Laurison (2019)

   • Uses interviews and statistical analysis to show that individuals from working-class backgrounds face hidden barriers in elite professions, even when they have the same credentials as their privileged peers.

10. Chetty et al.'s "The Opportunity Atlas" (2018, Harvard & U.S. Census Bureau)

• Large-scale study using U.S. tax data to show that economic mobility is highly dependent on geographic, racial, and class factors, contradicting the notion of equal opportunity.

• 
  

• These studies consistently show that meritocracy is more of an ideology than an empirical reality, reinforcing disparities while making them appear natural.